governance: add new collaborators XIII

[Trott]

Previous round of onboarding: #6282

List below is a work in progress.

People who have not been onboarded but who have been active in the project with non-trivial commits:

• @yorkie commits, comments

[JacksonTian]

+1 for @yorkie

[DavidCai1111]

❤️ 👍

[Fishrock123]

cc @nodejs/ctc but shouldn't have to be explicitly brought up at the meeting

[jasnell]

Definite support for @yorkie.

[evanlucas]

+1 for @yorkie!!! yay

[Trott]

Also:

• @bengl commits, comments

[MylesBorins]

+1 for both @yorkie and @bengl

[Trott]

A few more possibilities, if not this round then maybe a subsequent one:

• @jhamhader commits, comments
• @firedfox commits, comments

[Trott]

@Fishrock123 wrote:

cc @nodejs/ctc but shouldn't have to be explicitly brought up at the meeting

GOVERNANCE.md explicitly states it should be discussed at the weekly meeting:

[Potential new collaborators] are identified by the CTC and their addition as Collaborators is discussed during the weekly CTC meeting.

Either we should do that or we should update that document.

I'm going to re-add the ctc-agenda tag. If you or anyone else feels like this is unnecessary, we can talk about updating GOVERNANCE.md either at the meeting or in another issue. I don't have strong feelings about it, but I do want to follow our publicly published process as much as possible (and I'm sure you feel the same way on that last point).

[silverwind]

👍 to @firedfox!