Inconsistent naming of patched/fixed affected/vulnerable ...

[Hritik14]

We've decided on

• affected
• fixed

Everything else needs to go.

[osBins]

Hey @Hritik14, is this issue resolved? If not, I'd like to work on this!

[Hritik14]

@osBins This is still an issue. You have a green light 🟢 :)

[pombredanne]

@osBins can you highlight here what would be your approach?

[osBins]

Hi @pombredanne, I'm trying to get to know the code base better and thus wished to take up this good first issue. I looked at PR #525 (mentioned this issue^) to gain clarity on what exactly needs to be done, however I couldn't catch it. I'd be glad if you could let me know what needs to be done and if there's a preferred approach to go about it. Thank you!

[abhishak3]

Do we need to change the naming in the whole codebase or only in some files? I think I can work on this.

[Hritik14]

@abhishak3 The naming will have to be consistent across our codebase. We've chosen affected and fixed and all other instances must be replaced accordingly.

[unibik]

Hi @Hritik14 is this issue still open? or fixed?

[DennisClark]

This issue was addressed by other issues and has been fixed. Closing.